• No Comments

In this paper, three assembly balancing methods were studied: largest Candidate Rule (LCR),. Kilbridge and Wester (KWC), and Ranked Positional Weight. KILBRIDGE & WESTER METHOD. Problem 2: The following list defines the precedence relationships & element times for a new model toy: Element. 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. EXAMPLE 3: Kilbridge and Wester Method Apply the Kilbridge and Wester method to Example Problem 1. ‘ TABLE 4: Work Elements Assigned to Stations.

Author: Midal Faekazahn
Country: Maldives
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 16 July 2011
Pages: 65
PDF File Size: 17.49 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.7 Mb
ISBN: 788-4-14543-497-9
Downloads: 85002
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samushakar

You are commenting using your Facebook account. For convenience, include the T e value and immediate predecessors for each element.


For large balancing problems, involving perhaps several hundred work elements, these kilbridfe methods of solution become awkward. Our tutors will make sure that you achieve the highest grades for your industrial management assignments. Have a Referral code?

Posted 13 days ago. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. We then start the search over again from the top of the list.


Get homework help anytime, anywhere! The work elements are selected for assignment to stations simply on the basis of the size of westeern T e values. Learn how to solve the Rubik’s Cube with the easiest method. The largest-candidate rule provides an approach that is appropriate for only simpler line balancing problems. However, the practical realities of the line balancing problem may not permit the realization of this number.

Submit Your Questions Here! The RPW takes account of both the T e value of the element and metnod position in the precedence diagram. The steps used in solving the line balancing problem are listed below, followed by Example 6.

Stay ahead in your courses Sign UP now.


Of course, the most desirable number of stations is that which satisfies Eq. Now, looking at the wesgern table, little readjustment it work element is possible if the cycle time is extended to 18 min. One comment should be made which applies not only to the largest-candidate rule but to the other methods as well. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Posted 10 days ago. Explain the different types of Hackers attacks and different types of protections Ranked positional weights method The ranked positional weights procedure was introduced by Helgeson and Birnie in [6].


It is important for students to understand the integrated nature To begin on the second station, element 3 from column II would ane entered first. List the elements in order of their columns, column I at the top of the list. Assign elements to stations according to RPW, avoiding precedence constraint and time-cycle violations.

Describe in detail and Write a 10 or 8 different between cost indifference point and break even Number of stations would be:.

In the following section we survey some of these computerized approaches. Continue the process of assigning work elements to the station as in step 2 until no further elements can be added without exceeding T c.

This RPW value is 3. Understood it very well! Steps 2 and 3 result in the assignment of elements 2, 5, 1, and 4 to station 1.