• No Comments

*FM Headquarters. Department of the Anny. Washington. DC. 28 September INTELLIGENCE INTERROGATION. Table of Contents. Page. dures and techniques applicable to Army intelligence interrogations, applies to the psychological operations (PSYOP) contained in FM FM Intelligence Interrogation. Chapter 3. Interrogation Process. The interrogation process involves the screening and selection of sources for.

Author: Malarn Tutaur
Country: Samoa
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 28 September 2012
Pages: 172
PDF File Size: 9.56 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.11 Mb
ISBN: 666-8-31893-742-5
Downloads: 53529
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shaktijind

The use of repeated questions may develop a topic that the source had refused to talk about earlier.

FM Intelligence Interrogation : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

All jnterrogation information should not be recorded until after the source’s cooperation has been obtained. An example of this form is shown in Appendix F.

Questions usually flow one-from-another based on the answer to previous questions. Questioning Techniques Use good questioning techniques throughout the questioning phase. Whatever the motivation, it is the most significant factor used by an interrogator to achieve ibtelligence.

Rapport between the interrogator and the source is really nothing more than a two? He must use f, past experiences to decide which items of information should be recorded.

The importance of accurate reporting cannot be overstressed, since interrogation reports are often the basis for tactical decisions and operations. This often is the case in low-intensity conflict LIC where the people may be fearful of insurgent reprisals.


The interrogator should appear to be the one who controls all aspects of the interrogation to include the lighting, heating, and configuration of the interrogation room, as well as the food, shelter, and clothing given to the source.

At no time should the interrogator rebuke his interpreter sternly or loudly while they are with the source.

Screeners ask each source about the circumstances of his capture, his personal background, his military job, and his unit of assignment. Is the source injured, angry, crying, arrogant, cocky, or frightened? If the interrogator’s personal manner reflects fairness, strength, and efficiency, the source may prove cooperative and more receptive to questioning.

Depending on the situation, circumstances, and any requests the source may have made, the following can also be used to develop rapport: The new manual specifically prohibits tm of the controversial enhanced interrogation techniques including ” waterboarding ” which brought the matter to public attention, and also stipulates that the list is not all-inclusive of prohibited actions.

Rapport is established when the source reacts to the interrogator’s statement. In this way, the interrogator refines his element’s overall objective into a set of specific topics for his interrogation. Screeners should look for things like attempts to talk to the guards, intentionally joining placement in the wrong segregation group, or any signs of nervousness, anxiety, or fear.

Inetlligence careful assessment of the source is absolutely necessary to avoid wasting valuable time in the approach phase. The interrogator must avoid distracting the source while taking notes. This page was last edited on 25 Octoberat Repeated questions ask the source for the same information obtained in response to earlier questions.


The interrogator must leave the source ready to continue answering questions in the future if necessary. The DCPR can be the reference point furthest back in time, distance, or higher echelon. Each interrogation has a definite purpose?

He maintains his established sequence of questioning to ensure that no topics are missed. Electronic SALUTE reports are formatted and submitted according to the procedures established during the senior interrogator’s initial coordination.


Transitions can also be smoothly covered by leaving the unsuccessful approach and going back to nonpertinent questions. Provide the date and time when he obtained his information. The interrogator is alert to detect any attempt made by the source to elicit information. Helping the source to rationalize his guilt. The source’s mental intelligene physical state. The variations are limited only by the interrogator’s personality, experience, ingenuity, and imagination.

On September 6,the U. By knowing the inyelligence events affecting the target country, the interrogator will better understand the general situation in the target country, as well as the causes and repercussions.